Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me

TOPIC: (POST-GAME) @Villanova, Tues., Jan. 8, 7p, FS-1 / 970 AM

(POST-GAME) @Villanova, Tues., Jan. 8, 7p, FS-1 / 970 AM 10 months 1 week ago #313760

  • oldschool Redmen
  • oldschool Redmen's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Posts: 3268
  • Thank you received: 634
Simon get a lay up with 4:07 left to put us up 67-62, then get outscored 14-4 to end the game, disgusting.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Paultzman

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

(POST-GAME) @Villanova, Tues., Jan. 8, 7p, FS-1 / 970 AM 10 months 1 week ago #313761

  • Knight
  • Knight's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Posts: 5224
  • Thank you received: 1203
Villanova had 22 FTs vs. 8 for SJU.
The following user(s) said Thank You: section10

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

(POST-GAME) @Villanova, Tues., Jan. 8, 7p, FS-1 / 970 AM 10 months 1 week ago #313762

  • fordham96
  • fordham96's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Posts: 1963
  • Thank you received: 1816

Andrew wrote: Very similar to the Seton Hall game. We came flying out of the gate. Had one get stretch in the second half and then fell apart. Paschall was hot in the first half and then Booth in the second.


Almost a carbon copy.

They don't have enough firepower inside or on the bench to really put a game away against a solid opponent when they have control. Turn a 12 point lead into 17 or 20.

50-39 and they give up a 12-0 run.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

(POST-GAME) @Villanova, Tues., Jan. 8, 7p, FS-1 / 970 AM 10 months 1 week ago #313763

  • Andrew
  • Andrew's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Posts: 5367
  • Thank you received: 896

Knight wrote: Villanova had 22 FTs vs. 8 for SJU.


Thats not unusual when we play them.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

(POST-GAME) @Villanova, Tues., Jan. 8, 7p, FS-1 / 970 AM 10 months 1 week ago #313764

  • Sherman, Sheridan & Grant
  • Sherman, Sheridan & Grant's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Posts: 2614
  • Thank you received: 883

mattc wrote:

alexander salem wrote: I reiterate, we will not be ranked for a long time after this one. After Depaul on saturday....@Butler, Creighton, Georgetown. Very possible we only go 2-2 if LJ can or can't go this saturday.

Our next 3 games after that.....
@Creighton
@Marquette
@Duke.

Anyone see us realistically winning these next 6 of our next 7? Especially if our road finishes are going to be the norm the rest of the season? This Nova win would have surely kept us in the rankings solidly and generating buzz for the program.

We Shall march on...


Frustrating loss for sure but think you're overreacting just a little.


Yes Mattc
Disappointing but disastrous? Hopeless ? Forlorn?
We are 14-2, split 4 tough games, will likely have additional Ws and Ls - is that not how this sport goes? I know a bit glib.
We are having a good year and most likely we will keep winning more than we lose.
Our kids play hard and yes why not more use of the bench. I guess we’ll discover that soon enough.
Thanks!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

(POST-GAME) @Villanova, Tues., Jan. 8, 7p, FS-1 / 970 AM 10 months 1 week ago #313765

  • austour
  • austour's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Posts: 5403
  • Thank you received: 854

Andrew wrote:

Knight wrote: Villanova had 22 FTs vs. 8 for SJU.


Thats not unusual when we play them.


. . . and don't really penetrate very much.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

(POST-GAME) @Villanova, Tues., Jan. 8, 7p, FS-1 / 970 AM 10 months 1 week ago #313766

  • Room112
  • Room112's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Posts: 2141
  • Thank you received: 918
I'm not sure why the bench wasn't used more. Specifically Williams and Keita. That was troubling and hopefully coach learns from it. Kids looked gassed as others said.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

(POST-GAME) @Villanova, Tues., Jan. 8, 7p, FS-1 / 970 AM 10 months 1 week ago #313767

  • Section3
  • Section3's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Posts: 2175
  • Thank you received: 398

Tonyinfairfield wrote: Ponds played 39 minutes, Simon 38, Figgy 34, Clark 33 and Heron 24.

Keita played 5, Williams 0 and Trimble 27.

That was the game right there. Didn’t use bench. Team tired down stretch.

Redmen better team. Should have won by 8.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

(POST-GAME) @Villanova, Tues., Jan. 8, 7p, FS-1 / 970 AM 10 months 1 week ago #313768

  • Tonyinfairfield
  • Tonyinfairfield 's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Posts: 2730
  • Thank you received: 367

Andrew wrote:

Knight wrote: Villanova had 22 FTs vs. 8 for SJU.


Thats not unusual when we play them.


Maybe if we drove to the basket more, we might have gone to the foul line more often.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Delaware, Andrew, Knight

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

(POST-GAME) @Villanova, Tues., Jan. 8, 7p, FS-1 / 970 AM 10 months 1 week ago #313769

  • Section3
  • Section3's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Posts: 2175
  • Thank you received: 398

Ilzion wrote: HOW MANY POINTS DID WE HAVE AFTER A TIMEOUT? I BELIEVE ZERO! AWFUL.

WHO IS THE HEAD COACH MULLIN OR ST JEAN. IT SEEMS LIKE ST JEAN DOES MORE TALKING AND DRAWING UP OF PLAYS THAN MULLIN DURING STOPPAGES.

Stop it.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: mkras99SJUFAN2espkengmanlawmanfankranmarsOhioFanotisredmannorthKnight