Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me

TOPIC: (POST-GAME) @Villanova, Tues., Jan. 8, 7p, FS-1 / 970 AM

(POST-GAME) @Villanova, Tues., Jan. 8, 7p, FS-1 / 970 AM 6 days 22 hours ago #313760

  • oldschool Redmen
  • oldschool Redmen's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Posts: 2337
  • Thank you received: 290
Simon get a lay up with 4:07 left to put us up 67-62, then get outscored 14-4 to end the game, disgusting.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Paultzman

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

(POST-GAME) @Villanova, Tues., Jan. 8, 7p, FS-1 / 970 AM 6 days 22 hours ago #313761

  • Knight
  • Knight's Avatar Topic Author
  • Away
  • Posts: 4167
  • Thank you received: 490
Villanova had 22 FTs vs. 8 for SJU.
The following user(s) said Thank You: section10

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

(POST-GAME) @Villanova, Tues., Jan. 8, 7p, FS-1 / 970 AM 6 days 22 hours ago #313762

  • fordham96
  • fordham96's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Posts: 1155
  • Thank you received: 827

Andrew wrote: Very similar to the Seton Hall game. We came flying out of the gate. Had one get stretch in the second half and then fell apart. Paschall was hot in the first half and then Booth in the second.


Almost a carbon copy.

They don't have enough firepower inside or on the bench to really put a game away against a solid opponent when they have control. Turn a 12 point lead into 17 or 20.

50-39 and they give up a 12-0 run.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

(POST-GAME) @Villanova, Tues., Jan. 8, 7p, FS-1 / 970 AM 6 days 22 hours ago #313763

  • Andrew
  • Andrew's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Posts: 4958
  • Thank you received: 495

Knight wrote: Villanova had 22 FTs vs. 8 for SJU.


Thats not unusual when we play them.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

(POST-GAME) @Villanova, Tues., Jan. 8, 7p, FS-1 / 970 AM 6 days 22 hours ago #313764

  • Sherman, Sheridan & Grant
  • Sherman, Sheridan & Grant's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Posts: 2332
  • Thank you received: 463

mattc wrote:

alexander salem wrote: I reiterate, we will not be ranked for a long time after this one. After Depaul on saturday....@Butler, Creighton, Georgetown. Very possible we only go 2-2 if LJ can or can't go this saturday.

Our next 3 games after that.....
@Creighton
@Marquette
@Duke.

Anyone see us realistically winning these next 6 of our next 7? Especially if our road finishes are going to be the norm the rest of the season? This Nova win would have surely kept us in the rankings solidly and generating buzz for the program.

We Shall march on...


Frustrating loss for sure but think you're overreacting just a little.


Yes Mattc
Disappointing but disastrous? Hopeless ? Forlorn?
We are 14-2, split 4 tough games, will likely have additional Ws and Ls - is that not how this sport goes? I know a bit glib.
We are having a good year and most likely we will keep winning more than we lose.
Our kids play hard and yes why not more use of the bench. I guess we’ll discover that soon enough.
Thanks!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

(POST-GAME) @Villanova, Tues., Jan. 8, 7p, FS-1 / 970 AM 6 days 22 hours ago #313765

  • austour
  • austour's Avatar
  • Away
  • Posts: 4952
  • Thank you received: 480

Andrew wrote:

Knight wrote: Villanova had 22 FTs vs. 8 for SJU.


Thats not unusual when we play them.


. . . and don't really penetrate very much.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

(POST-GAME) @Villanova, Tues., Jan. 8, 7p, FS-1 / 970 AM 6 days 22 hours ago #313766

  • Room112
  • Room112's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Posts: 1766
  • Thank you received: 543
I'm not sure why the bench wasn't used more. Specifically Williams and Keita. That was troubling and hopefully coach learns from it. Kids looked gassed as others said.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

(POST-GAME) @Villanova, Tues., Jan. 8, 7p, FS-1 / 970 AM 6 days 22 hours ago #313767

  • Section3
  • Section3's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Posts: 1844
  • Thank you received: 159

Tonyinfairfield wrote: Ponds played 39 minutes, Simon 38, Figgy 34, Clark 33 and Heron 24.

Keita played 5, Williams 0 and Trimble 27.

That was the game right there. Didn’t use bench. Team tired down stretch.

Redmen better team. Should have won by 8.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

(POST-GAME) @Villanova, Tues., Jan. 8, 7p, FS-1 / 970 AM 6 days 22 hours ago #313768

  • Tonyinfairfield
  • Tonyinfairfield 's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Posts: 2501
  • Thank you received: 169

Andrew wrote:

Knight wrote: Villanova had 22 FTs vs. 8 for SJU.


Thats not unusual when we play them.


Maybe if we drove to the basket more, we might have gone to the foul line more often.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Delaware, Andrew, Knight

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

(POST-GAME) @Villanova, Tues., Jan. 8, 7p, FS-1 / 970 AM 6 days 22 hours ago #313769

  • Section3
  • Section3's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Posts: 1844
  • Thank you received: 159

Ilzion wrote: HOW MANY POINTS DID WE HAVE AFTER A TIMEOUT? I BELIEVE ZERO! AWFUL.

WHO IS THE HEAD COACH MULLIN OR ST JEAN. IT SEEMS LIKE ST JEAN DOES MORE TALKING AND DRAWING UP OF PLAYS THAN MULLIN DURING STOPPAGES.

Stop it.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: mkras99SJUFAN2espkengmanlawmanfankranmarsOhioFanotisredmannorthKnight

ATTENTION:Lurkers!

Login and See less ads - AUTOMATICALLY

the redmen.com audience is over 99% LURKERS. People that read the site but don't login or participate.

Logged in members automatically have less advertisements appear when viewing redmen.com. It seems only fair if you are taking advantage of the site but not contributing, you're gonna see more ads to help keep the site going, right?

If you are an existing member but have not logged in for a while and don't remember your login information, use the links below. It is important that you keep your email address current for this to work and if you no longer have access to your old email address, (or to report other problems) please contact me directly via handy "Contact" icon on the bottom right of the site. You can private message me on the site if you are logged in, but still need help.

If you signup as a new user, you will initially be limited to posting in the Rookie Forum. This is a get-to-know-you measure and a way to weed out spam and other malicious and inappropriate content.

If you want to see less ads, SIGNUP and LOGIN TODAY.


If you have forgotten your username and/or password here are two links to address that (the links only work if you are not currently logged in):

forgot username:

forgot password:


Please consider a recurring monthly contribution.
Help Support Redmen.com
Thank you, Paul

Follow redmen.com on Twitter