Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me

TOPIC: Villanova, Sat. Jan. 14, 12 Noon, FS1/570AM

Villanova, Sat. Jan. 14, 12 Noon, FS1/570AM 1 month 2 weeks ago #239101

  • Paultzman
  • Paultzman's Avatar
  • NOW ONLINE
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Posts: 13938
  • Thank you received: 13639
  • Karma: 270
cappy105 wrote:
Paultzman wrote:
Wright goes easy on Johnnies & Nova by 15.
damn you Paultz...was hoping you'd give us a fair shake. hate when your right lately

15 seems generous. :)
The administrator has disabled public write access.

Villanova, Sat. Jan. 14, 12 Noon, FS1/570AM 1 month 2 weeks ago #239109

  • we are sju
  • we are sju's Avatar
  • NOW ONLINE
  • Expert Boarder
  • Posts: 2499
  • Thank you received: 1562
  • Karma: -122
Paultzman wrote:
cappy105 wrote:
Paultzman wrote:
Wright goes easy on Johnnies & Nova by 15.
damn you Paultz...was hoping you'd give us a fair shake. hate when your right lately

15 seems generous. :)
50-39 at half
95-62 final
The administrator has disabled public write access.

Villanova, Sat. Jan. 14, 12 Noon, FS1/570AM 1 month 2 weeks ago #239115

  • lawmanfan
  • lawmanfan's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 1409
  • Thank you received: 936
  • Karma: -11991
I really wanted to pick the upset in this game. Have thought from the beginning that we match up better with Nova than we do with some other teams, and figured on a big effort at home in the Garden against a highly ranked team.

The problem is that even with that I don't see how we hold Nova under 90, and even if I'm right about us playing a good game I don't see us scoring more than 83.

So 95-83 Nova.
The administrator has disabled public write access.

Villanova, Sat. Jan. 14, 12 Noon, FS1/570AM 1 month 2 weeks ago #239137

  • McGarry2
  • McGarry2's Avatar
  • NOW ONLINE
  • Expert Boarder
  • Posts: 895
  • Thank you received: 116
  • Karma: -8
lawmanfan wrote:
I really wanted to pick the upset in this game. Have thought from the beginning that we match up better with Nova than we do with some other teams, and figured on a big effort at home in the Garden against a highly ranked team.

The problem is that even with that I don't see how we hold Nova under 90, and even if I'm right about us playing a good game I don't see us scoring more than 83.

So 95-83 Nova.

Am I mistaken or does Villanova have a gang of guards in the 6-3 t0 6-5 range and we have 3 short ones
The administrator has disabled public write access.

Villanova, Sat. Jan. 14, 12 Noon, FS1/570AM 1 month 2 weeks ago #239139

  • Andrew2
  • Andrew2's Avatar
  • NOW ONLINE
  • Gold Boarder
  • Posts: 3923
  • Thank you received: 1356
  • Karma: -40
McGarry2 wrote:
lawmanfan wrote:
I really wanted to pick the upset in this game. Have thought from the beginning that we match up better with Nova than we do with some other teams, and figured on a big effort at home in the Garden against a highly ranked team.

The problem is that even with that I don't see how we hold Nova under 90, and even if I'm right about us playing a good game I don't see us scoring more than 83.

So 95-83 Nova.

Am I mistaken or does Villanova have a gang of guards in the 6-3 t0 6-5 range and we have 3 short ones

They play seven guys. Brunson is the smallest one at about 6'3. Hart, Jenkins,Bridges and ,Divincenczo are all around 6'5 and 6"6. Paschall is 6"7 250 and Reynolds is 6"9 240. Our top seven by scoring go 6', 6'1,6'2, 6'6,6'7,6'7 and 6"11. None of those seven weighs more than 215 pounds. Williams and Amar are the heaviest options.
Last Edit: 1 month 2 weeks ago by Andrew2.
The administrator has disabled public write access.

Villanova, Sat. Jan. 14, 12 Noon, FS1/570AM 1 month 2 weeks ago #239140

  • Paul Massell
  • Paul Massell's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 2799
  • Thank you received: 2172
  • Karma: 102
lawmanfan wrote:
I really wanted to pick the upset in this game. Have thought from the beginning that we match up better with Nova than we do with some other teams, and figured on a big effort at home in the Garden against a highly ranked team.

The problem is that even with that I don't see how we hold Nova under 90, and even if I'm right about us playing a good game I don't see us scoring more than 83.

So 95-83 Nova.

Well it makes sense. Butler beat Nova, We beat Butler thus we are the better team. ;)
“Be the change that you wish to see in the world.”
The administrator has disabled public write access.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Monte, mjmaherjr

Villanova, Sat. Jan. 14, 12 Noon, FS1/570AM 1 month 2 weeks ago #239141

  • fuchsia
  • fuchsia's Avatar
  • NOW ONLINE
  • Expert Boarder
  • Posts: 893
  • Thank you received: 336
  • Karma: 12
Paul Massell wrote:
lawmanfan wrote:
I really wanted to pick the upset in this game. Have thought from the beginning that we match up better with Nova than we do with some other teams, and figured on a big effort at home in the Garden against a highly ranked team.

The problem is that even with that I don't see how we hold Nova under 90, and even if I'm right about us playing a good game I don't see us scoring more than 83.

So 95-83 Nova.

Well it makes sense. Butler beat Nova, We beat Butler thus we are the better team. ;)

Dante's Inferno, Canto XXVII
The administrator has disabled public write access.
The following user(s) said Thank You: lawmanfan

Villanova, Sat. Jan. 14, 12 Noon, FS1/570AM 1 month 2 weeks ago #239142

  • Monte
  • Monte's Avatar
  • NOW ONLINE
  • Gold Boarder
  • Posts: 3979
  • Thank you received: 3430
  • Karma: -192
I like that kid DiVincenzo
The administrator has disabled public write access.

Villanova, Sat. Jan. 14, 12 Noon, FS1/570AM 1 month 2 weeks ago #239146

  • Paultzman
  • Paultzman's Avatar
  • NOW ONLINE
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Posts: 13938
  • Thank you received: 13639
  • Karma: 270
Word is St John's-Villanova is close to a sellout Saturday, and belief is it will be. #sjubb

Per Zach
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Time to create page: 0.614 seconds